%
% File coling08.tex
%
% Contact: R.P.Evans@brighton.ac.uk

\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage{naaclhlt2009}
\usepackage{times} 
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage[round]{natbib} 
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb} 
\usepackage{array} 
\usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx} 
\usepackage{hyperref} 

%% sloppy linebreaks 
%\sloppy 

%% no extra spacing after dots
%\frenchspacing

%% interline spacing
\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{.960} 

\setlength\titlebox{6.5cm}    % Expanding the titlebox

\title{Multilingual Semantic Role Labelling with Markov Logic}

\author{
Ivan Meza-Ruiz\footnotemark[1]  \qquad Sebastian Riedel\footnotemark[2] 
\footnotemark[3]   \\
\footnotemark[1]  {School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, UK}\\
\footnotemark[2]  {Department of Computer Science, University of Tokyo, Japan}\\
\footnotemark[3]  {Database Center for Life Science, Research Organization of 
Information and System, Japan}\\
\footnotemark[1]  \tt  I.V.Meza-Ruiz@sms.ed.ac.uk \footnotemark[2] \tt 
sebastian.riedel@gmail.com
}



\date{} 

\begin{document} 


\input{macros.tex}
\maketitle
\begin{abstract}
This paper presents our system for the CoNLL 2009 Shared
Task on Syntactic and Semantic Dependencies in Multiple
Languages \citep{CoNLL-2009-ST}. In this work we focus only
on the Semantic Role Labelling (SRL) task. We use Markov Logic to define a joint SRL model and achieve
the third best average performance in the closed Track for SRLOnly systems and 
the sixth including for both SRLOnly and Joint systems.
\end{abstract}
\section{Markov Logic} \label{sec:markovlogic}

\input{markovlogic.tex}

\section{Model} \label{sec:model} 
\input{model.tex}

\subsection{Local formulae}\label{sec:local} 
 
\input{local.tex}

\subsection{Global formulae}

\input{global.tex}

\section{Results}\label{sec:results}

\input{results.tex}

%\subsection{Analysis}\label{sec:analysis}

\input{analysis}

\section{Conclusion} \label{sec:conclusion}

\input{conclusions.tex}

\bibliographystyle{plainnat}
\bibliography{extra,seb}

\end{document}

% Reviwer 1

% 1. native speaker
% 2. Remove 4.1 subheading (done! take out the reference to the label as well )
% 3. Include average scores (done)
% 4. Table 1 reference wrong render (done)
% 5. Fix footnotes (done).
% 6. Use \noindent in the list 
% 7. Typos
    %Abstract:
    %"Task in" -> "Task on" (done)
    %"focus only in" -> "focus only on" (done)
    %"closed Track for SRLOnly system" -> "closed track for SRLOnly systems" (done)
    %Page 1:
    %"that require to answer ... questions" -> "that are required to answer
    %questions such as ..." (done)
    %Page 2:
    %"refer predicates" -> "refer to predicates" (done)
    %The third item in the list is not syntactically coherent. (kind of done)
    %Page 3:
    %"The here presented ML predicates" -> "The ML predicates presented here" (done)
    %Page 4:
    %"these lists does" -> "these lists do" (done)
    %The caption of Table 1 is garbled. (done)
    %Page 5:
    %"empiricaly" -> "empirically" (not found)
    %"SRLonly-closed track" -> "closed track for SRLOnly systems" (not found)
    %"f1" -> "F1" (done)
    %"for the English" -> "for English" (done)
    %"of rather technical" -> "of a rather technical" (done)

% Reviewer 2.
% Minor issues:
% p1. the last sentence in abstract: => .. sixth for joint systems. (done)
% p4. right column, the reference to Table 1 is broken and shown as ?? 


% Our notes:
%   * Change descripions of rules for shorter versions (use templates, maybe put them into tables with smaller font size—-the bullet points don't look to good I think)
%   * Clarify the use of modules
%   * Fix Czech sense heuristic?
%   * Show some numbers that explain check problems?
%   * Explain effect of Japanese formulae
 
